In a Noetherian ring, many ideals can be written as finite intersections of primary ideals. The example is deliberately concrete; it is a test of the statement, not a substitute for it.
Notation
For a finite \(A\)-module \(M\), the support \(\operatorname{Supp}M\) records primes where localisation is nonzero. Associated primes identify annihilators of individual elements and expose the irreducible pieces of zero divisors.
The definition determines which expressions are legal; only then does the identity become meaningful. An equality in \(\mathcal A\) may change ambient meaning, so I keep \(\mathsf D\) separate from \(\mathsf C\).
Stress the formula
The computation below is not a second theorem. It is a checksum for the definitions and a place to inspect the difficult LaTeX at full size.
Interpretation
The aligned summary deliberately puts the datum and conclusion on different rows. Mathematically, this is the distinction between specifying an object and proving a property of it.
Limit of the argument
Primary decomposition is not unique term by term. Under Noetherian hypotheses, the isolated associated primes are canonical even when embedded components move.
This is enough machinery for one note: an exact object, a worked case, a structural law, and a clearly marked boundary. Each layer can now be tested independently.