One may sample a large object and delete one element from each surviving bad configuration. I will separate the object being defined from the consequence being claimed.
Statement
Extremal combinatorics asks how large a structure can be while avoiding a forbidden configuration. The probabilistic method proves existence by showing \(\mathbf P(X=0)>0\) or \(\mathbf E[X]<1\).
I read the first line as input and the second as output. The symbols \(\forall\) and \(\exists\) are not interchangeable, and neither may be upgraded silently to \(\Longleftrightarrow\).
Worked algebra
An explicit case prevents the notation from becoming ceremonial. Every subscript and superscript in the display contributes to the value.
Conceptual compression
The invariant statement is the one that does not depend on a convenient choice of coordinates, representatives, basis, or enumeration.
Caveat
An expectation below one proves that some outcome has zero bad objects only when the bad-object count is a nonnegative integer.
I would use the boxed line as a reference later, while returning to the full display whenever a hypothesis becomes uncertain. That division keeps compression from becoming ambiguity.