Independent Gaussian increments force the covariance of Brownian motion to equal the shared elapsed time. I want the notation, the mechanism, and the failure mode visible at the same time.
Objects and notation
Continuous-time processes are described by finite-dimensional distributions plus path regularity. A Poisson process \(N_t\) has independent increments, while Brownian motion \(B_t\) has Gaussian increments.
I read the first line as input and the second as output. The symbols \(\forall\) and \(\exists\) are not interchangeable, and neither may be upgraded silently to \(\Longleftrightarrow\).
Push the symbols
The middle display is intentionally dense: it is where signs, bounds, multiplicities, or normalising factors are most likely to be lost.
Structural reading
A good test for understanding is to change the presentation while keeping the invariant fixed. The aligned form makes that comparison unusually easy.
A hypothesis worth keeping
Matching means and variances does not identify a distribution. Independence, increment laws, and sample-path properties are separate ingredients.
The result is compact enough to reuse without pretending that the caveat has disappeared. The worked line remains the quickest consistency check.