The coefficient of a product sums over every split of the total index. I want the notation, the mechanism, and the failure mode visible at the same time.
Objects and notation
A sequence \((a_n)_{n\ge0}\) becomes a formal series \(A(x)=\sum_{n\ge0}a_nx^n\). Algebra on \(A(x)\) translates recurrences, convolution, and recursive constructions into coefficient identities.
The typography mirrors the proof: first declare \(\mathsf D\), then state \(\mathsf C\). The symbol \(\Longrightarrow\) below is a logical dependency, not extra mathematical structure.
Push the symbols
The computation below is not a second theorem. It is a checksum for the definitions and a place to inspect the difficult LaTeX at full size.
Structural reading
The aligned summary deliberately puts the datum and conclusion on different rows. Mathematically, this is the distinction between specifying an object and proving a property of it.
A hypothesis worth keeping
Formal power series permit algebra without analytic convergence, but substitution and inversion still require the correct constant terms.
A symbolic summary is trustworthy only because the example and limitation remain visible beside it. The box compresses the conclusion without hiding its origin.