The convolution of f and g sums f(d)g(n/d) over every divisor d of n. A small computation will anchor the general statement before the abstraction takes over.
The mathematical object
Arithmetic functions \(f:\mathbf N\to\mathbf C\) form a commutative ring under Dirichlet convolution. Multiplicative functions are determined by their values on prime powers \(p^k\).
There are two layers here: the object \(\mathsf D\) and the law \(\mathsf C\). Writing them separately makes the direction of \(\Longrightarrow\) visible and keeps an accidental converse from slipping in.
One explicit computation
An explicit case prevents the notation from becoming ceremonial. Every subscript and superscript in the display contributes to the value.
Why the identity matters
The aligned summary deliberately puts the datum and conclusion on different rows. Mathematically, this is the distinction between specifying an object and proving a property of it.
Where it can fail
Pointwise multiplication and Dirichlet convolution are different operations. Möbius inversion reverses convolution with the constant-one function, not ordinary multiplication.
I would use the boxed line as a reference later, while returning to the full display whenever a hypothesis becomes uncertain. That division keeps compression from becoming ambiguity.