The discriminant detects singularity, while the j-invariant classifies elliptic curves over an algebraic closure. I will separate the object being defined from the consequence being claimed.
Definitions first
An elliptic curve \(E/K\) is a smooth projective genus-one curve with a chosen point. In short Weierstrass form \(y^2=x^3+Ax+B\), smoothness is encoded by the discriminant.
The formulas should not be merged too early. The datum \(\mathsf D\), the conclusion \(\mathsf C\), and the bridge \(\Longrightarrow\) have three different logical jobs.
A small case in full
Here is a concrete symbolic test. Reading it from left to right reveals which transformation is reversible and which is only an implication.
The reusable statement
The abstraction earns its keep by explaining why the same computation reappears. The notation compresses repeated reasoning without erasing the hypothesis that licenses it.
A nearby false statement
Short Weierstrass form requires characteristic different from \(2\) and \(3\). Torsion and isogeny formulas also change in inseparable characteristic.
The notation is dense, but it is doing honest work: every delimiter records scope and every index records dependence. Removing one should require a mathematical reason.