Over an algebraically closed field, every operator is similar to blocks lambda I plus a nilpotent shift. This is a compact note, but the quantifiers and hypotheses stay on the page.
The data
An endomorphism \(T\in\operatorname{End}(V)\) carries two canonical polynomials: the characteristic polynomial \(\chi_T\) and minimal polynomial \(m_T\). Their factorizations control invariant subspaces.
The first display fixes the mathematical data. I label it \(\mathsf{data}\) mentally, while the next is the \(\mathsf{claim}\); the bridge between them is the displayed \(\Longrightarrow\), not an automatic implication.
Derivation
Here is a concrete symbolic test. Reading it from left to right reveals which transformation is reversible and which is only an implication.
Invariant content
The compact alignment is a local map of the argument: assumptions on the first row, consequence on the second. Any generalisation must preserve that dependency.
Scope
An eigenvalue list does not determine a matrix up to similarity. Jordan block sizes or invariant factors contain the missing data.
A symbolic summary is trustworthy only because the example and limitation remain visible beside it. The box compresses the conclusion without hiding its origin.