In a bipartite graph, maximum matching size equals minimum vertex-cover size. This is a compact note, but the quantifiers and hypotheses stay on the page.
Statement
Weighted paths minimize \(\sum_{e\in P}w(e)\), flows use values \(f:E\to\mathbf R_{\ge0}\) with conservation, and matchings enforce degree at most one. Each problem has a dual obstruction.
The typography mirrors the proof: first declare \(\mathsf D\), then state \(\mathsf C\). The symbol \(\Longrightarrow\) below is a logical dependency, not extra mathematical structure.
Worked algebra
The middle display is intentionally dense: it is where signs, bounds, multiplicities, or normalising factors are most likely to be lost.
Conceptual compression
The compact alignment is a local map of the argument: assumptions on the first row, consequence on the second. Any generalisation must preserve that dependency.
Caveat
Dijkstra requires nonnegative edge weights, while flow capacities must be interpreted on a directed residual network even when the original graph is undirected.
The notation is dense, but it is doing honest work: every delimiter records scope and every index records dependence. Removing one should require a mathematical reason.