The normalization of a domain is its integral closure inside the fraction field. I want the notation, the mechanism, and the failure mode visible at the same time.
The data
An element \(b\) is integral over \(A\) when it satisfies a monic polynomial with coefficients in \(A\). An extension \(A\subseteq B\) is integral when every \(b\in B\) has this property.
I read the first line as input and the second as output. The symbols \(\forall\) and \(\exists\) are not interchangeable, and neither may be upgraded silently to \(\Longleftrightarrow\).
Derivation
Here is a concrete symbolic test. Reading it from left to right reveals which transformation is reversible and which is only an implication.
Invariant content
The aligned summary deliberately puts the datum and conclusion on different rows. Mathematically, this is the distinction between specifying an object and proving a property of it.
Scope
Algebraic over a fraction field and integral over the base ring are different conditions. Denominators make many algebraic elements nonintegral.
The notation is dense, but it is doing honest work: every delimiter records scope and every index records dependence. Removing one should require a mathematical reason.