Deleting the smallest leaf repeatedly gives a bijection between labeled trees and sequences of length n minus two. A small computation will anchor the general statement before the abstraction takes over.
Statement
Graph invariants often satisfy deletion--contraction recurrences. The chromatic polynomial \(P_G(q)\) and Tutte polynomial \(T_G(x,y)\) package many counts into algebraic form.
There are two layers here: the object \(\mathsf D\) and the law \(\mathsf C\). Writing them separately makes the direction of \(\Longrightarrow\) visible and keeps an accidental converse from slipping in.
Worked algebra
A worked instance is useful here because it exposes every index that the compressed statement hides.
Conceptual compression
The abstraction earns its keep by explaining why the same computation reappears. The notation compresses repeated reasoning without erasing the hypothesis that licenses it.
Caveat
Deletion--contraction must distinguish loops and bridges. Applying the generic edge recurrence to either special case changes the invariant incorrectly.
The notation is dense, but it is doing honest work: every delimiter records scope and every index records dependence. Removing one should require a mathematical reason.