For a finitely generated module, support is exactly the variety of its annihilator. The example is deliberately concrete; it is a test of the statement, not a substitute for it.
Notation
For a finite \(A\)-module \(M\), the support \(\operatorname{Supp}M\) records primes where localisation is nonzero. Associated primes identify annihilators of individual elements and expose the irreducible pieces of zero divisors.
I keep the defining relation \(\mathsf D\) above the derived relation \(\mathsf C\). This exposes whether cancellation used \(x\ne0\) and whether the conclusion is canonical.
Stress the formula
Now evaluate one representative case. The result should agree with the structural law above, but it is obtained without assuming the conclusion.
Interpretation
The abstraction earns its keep by explaining why the same computation reappears. The notation compresses repeated reasoning without erasing the hypothesis that licenses it.
Limit of the argument
Primary decomposition is not unique term by term. Under Noetherian hypotheses, the isolated associated primes are canonical even when embedded components move.
I would use the boxed line as a reference later, while returning to the full display whenever a hypothesis becomes uncertain. That division keeps compression from becoming ambiguity.